THE CROSS OF QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL COMPUTING IN THE HUMAN BRAIN

The figure above (Cassella, 2018b) shows how our artistic facet in a cerebellar microcomplex re-adjusts into not giving the repetitive schema of an arm that gives something to someone else, stored by our autistic facet in a particular cerebral column. The teaser behind our implicit  self is prone to give and give not simultaneously, which makes quantum computing.

Quantum computing in the "being-and-nonbeing" thought produced in the  human cerebellum/brainstem combines (within teasing) giving with not giving. In the same way, a seated baby dealing  with his first solid food eats 1/3 (good), throws on the floor 1/3 (bad), and plays with 1/3 (better).

Teasing precedes exceptional feats, as in a seemingly useless soccer attacker (placed backwards in relation to his inimical goalkeeper), who places a goal (Cassella, 2018b) through a surprising bicycle kick. Ambiguity is the mother of creativity.

Both a pun and the movement that makes fun of a worthy opponent can be attributed to quantum imagination, which  deserves exploration and understanding, before smiling.

Although our autistic facet can smile, it cannot grasp humor. In the same way, autistics cannot make fun of others in the manner of the little girl that leans on teasing to offer a sweet to others before taking it away at the last second.

The teasing act performed by a one-year-old girl in combining a stored movement of her arm to give and give not a chocolate to an innocent visitor may help explain how our artistic facet works. 

Still, it is essential to explain first the difference between a 'forward' and an 'inverse' model, within the mysterious systems dynamics that allows us to match Coatl-Quetzal's  going to Venus through quantum coherence. 

After examining Ito's thought (2011), Cassella (2018b) attached the ability to predict, or 'see', the final position or the outcome of a phenomenon that we cannot and we should not stop to Ito's 'forward model'; and the capacity to produce the set of commands of a scheme that we want to take place and that we can change, to Ito's 'inverse model'. Obviously, we cannot control perfectly the movements of another person (Ito's "forward model"), while we can control what we decide to do (Ito's "Inverse model"). 

The fact that autistics experience difficulties to decide what to say and what to do (executive functioning) implies some damage to the use of the "inverse" dynamics, besides damage to the ability to cross an inverse with a forward dynamics.

In 1968, for instance, the soccer player Pele made a goal by crossing a pass linked to a forward model with a bicycle kick supported by an inverse model.

As with Pelé, only the best driver would stop in front of a green light, if he saw that a competing driver will approach the next intersection without stopping in front of a red light. Our autistic facet guides our foot in pressing the brake before a red light, or the accelerator before a green light. In the same way, our schizophrenic facet would press the accelerator in front of a red light if alcohol had set us free from the rules imposed by our autistic facet. 

Kindness and not teasing is the solution, although nature pushes us toward teasing others very early in life. 

In a similar manner, the driver that faces a green light and travels both in her car and in the car driven by an inebriated and competing driver will avoid a collision through kindness by crossing two forward models in her mind (the two cars going toward the intersection). A quantum driver will reach the next intersection through the principle of Ubiquity before both cars reach it, will come out unscathed from the virtual collision by virtue of the principle of Coincidence, will return to her car through an infinite speed, and will press in time the brake pedal, instead of pressing automatically the accelerator.

Within quantum neural computing, we can cross two forward models, two inverse models, or a forward with an inverse model, which shows the supremacy of the cerebellum in the social mammals that escaped the bite of a saber-toothed tiger more than 10,000 years ago.

Using our cognitive supremacy to eat other animals or to use their space (for example, by destroying a forest)  is not social. Similarly, the use of the word "social" (as in the socialism adored by nazis and communists) to impose slavery on others is not social. Because knowledge of the meaning of the word "social" is innate in human beings, however, the teasing girl of our example in the end will obliterate the desire to eat her chocolate, choosing instead the option to give it away to an unknown visitor. 

The next section shows that social attitudes can be attributed to beta or delta brain waves; social lies, to alfa brain waves; and social attitudes,  to theta brain waves.

Any person on Earth would reach the Wisdom (Seeing or Vision) of the 3rd. Attention and the Will of the Third Point if he or she used the principles of quantum computing to win with others, especially his or her enemies, notwithstanding  the pain caused by such a decision.

A hypothesis goes that the decision to go by the principles of classical computing or to go by the principles of quantum computing  is handled by cerebellar microcomplexes through the brainstem that hosts the true archer. (The fact that the cerebrum and the cerebellum are divided in two hemispheres opposite to each other implies a superior coordination somewhere).

A cerebellar micro-complex, then, should have the power to coordinate both the linkage between two sensations and between two concepts. That feat is implied by our capacity to appreciate the beauty of a work of art, the song "Volare" sung by Domenico Modugno, and the vibration of the diapason shown under the portrait of the Egyptian god Osiris in the "Products"  page of this website.

The fact that some mentally-retarded autistics have a bigger-than-normal head and cerebral cortex implies that their diminished ability to link known concepts  obeys a central damage of their cerebellum/brainstem. If we take them as our best students, autistics may become our best teachers.

We could win big with autistic persons by understanding in the first place where they stand in relation to Piaget's path of the growth of classical computing in early development; and in the second place, by devising new teaching methods that lead autistics into crossing safely virtual intersections with the help of their own theta waves.

The figure above offers also Cassella's Vision that the act of pressing the brake in front of a green traffic light, implies four hypotheses:

• Beta brain waves reflect the act of sending  copies of the 'schemata' stored in the cerebral cortex from the thalamus to the brainstem and the deep cerebellar nuclei; thus, we will press the brake in front of a red traffic light and accelerate in front of a green light.
• alpha brain waves reflect our decision to embrace both a known schema and its crazy negation (such a trick feeds the infinite speed of quantum computing).
• delta waves reflect the crazy negation of established rules, as in an intoxicated driver who will cross an intersection with a red light. And, finally, 
• theta waves reveal our decision to donate  a cup of kindness to a seemingly crazy, bossy, bullying, high-handed, or drunk driver, letting him or her break the rules; especially to show ourselves that, unlike Salman Rushdie, we can  differentiate the voice of Gabriel from the  voice of the devil. The devil will never receive the grace of God, for he will always choose the role of torturer,  over the role of victim.

Unlike a kind person, a diabolical torturer would play with a prisoner before abusing him or her. The torturer does that because he or she has the blessing of a diabolical boss; or because there are stupid citizens who believe that they can negotiate with a tyrant supported by another powerful tyrant, as in an absolute monarchy.

Tyrannical abusers dispel social values, clinging to our autistic disposition to obey any established authority while ignoring that their betrayal will be followed  by their eventual fall into the abyss of madness.

Social values pave the way of the Third Attention in masterpieces of the arts, and in Sacred Texts of all religions (Cassella, 2019a). The story of Jacob-Israel exemplifies the process of jumping from the way of coherence, on which we may sin big, into the way of decoherence on which we might win big. 

Then and there, we will play with our memory, our capacity for swindling others, for disobeying any law, and with a heart (or emotional intelligence) capable of adapting to contest in helping others to forgive, to repent of their sins, and to use in an altruistic fashion the quantum power of the 2nd attention.

Thus, in deference of the grace offered by divine justice, we will lie to save others. And by saving others, we will save the self.